Yaser Salari; mohammad nejati
Abstract
AbstractMulla Sadra believes in interpreting the event of the Resurrection that both the minor and the great resurrection have been realized in the direction of nature and self, and in the interpretation of the Qur'an, he has interpreted the verses related to the realization of the Resurrection and the ...
Read More
AbstractMulla Sadra believes in interpreting the event of the Resurrection that both the minor and the great resurrection have been realized in the direction of nature and self, and in the interpretation of the Qur'an, he has interpreted the verses related to the realization of the Resurrection and the bloating as a mati. In a strange claim, Dr. Soroush considers mulla Sadra's interpretive approach as a means of acknowledging and accepting the basis of the dream of revelation and speaks to himself about the co-ordination of the voices of the muslims. In reviewing and criticizing this claim, which has been done by descriptive and analytical method, two main issues come to mind: first, contrary to Soroush's claim, Mulla Sadra's belief in the realization of the Resurrection is based on his intellectual and philosophical foundations in transcendental wisdom and has nothing to do with the dreaming of revelation. The second issue is that the correct understanding of Mulla Sadra's view of the resurrection will indicate the addressing aspect of the Qur'an. Because from Sadra's point of view, regardless of the prophet's dream and dream, both the soghra and the great resurrection have been realized objectively and its uprising toward different people can be old or late because of their differences in existence.
Mohammad Nejati; Farid Moeinpour; Feme sadat Mohseni shahri
Abstract
Contemporary physics believes that gravity and repulsion between sub-atoms cause vibrational motion and constant movement in objects, and considers this movement unstoppable even at the zero point of energy and a kind of necessity for the existence of the body. From this point of view, the cessation ...
Read More
Contemporary physics believes that gravity and repulsion between sub-atoms cause vibrational motion and constant movement in objects, and considers this movement unstoppable even at the zero point of energy and a kind of necessity for the existence of the body. From this point of view, the cessation of intrinsic movement can be imagined only if the body disintegrates. On the basis of the originality of existence, Mulla Sadra extends motion in the existence of skeptical beings and considers substantial and intensified motion as inseparable components of moving beings. According to him, the movement and intensity of beings are permanent and will not stop even after death and resurrection. These two bases are comparable in several ways: Both bases have been proposed due to the inefficiency of previous systems. Both foundations consider the existence of motion as a prerequisite for the existence of beings capable of movement and movement. Contemporary physics, however, considers the intrinsic movement in the material world and current bodies, but in Sadra's final approach, motion and intensity, in addition to the material world, extend to all metaphysical beings except the necessary transcendence.
